LIVE DATA LOADING
FETCHING CURRENT REGISTRY DATA • PROJECT STATUS WILL UPDATE AUTOMATICALLY
SYNCING
#31

M Agent: Recruiter Expertise Infrastructure

0.00score
Open GitHub RepositoryOpen Project WebsiteShare card
0
rezcarbon/truematch-m-agent-demo
OtherOPC-SG

M Agent solves the recruiter expertise gap by giving hiring teams instant 15-year-veteran-level capability through evidence-verified assessment + 6 non-bypassable patent gates. THE PROBLEM: Recruiters need 10–15 years to develop good hiring judgment. Most teams don't have that. Traditional screening misses embodied expertise (GitHub commits, published papers, coherent work history). THE SOLUTION: M Agent extracts claims from resumes, cross-references them against embodied proof (GitHub, DOI papers, certifications, work history), then enforces integrity through 6 patented gates (coherence, temporal depth, confidence bounds, physiological evidence, logic separability, orchestration). THE MOAT: 6 IPOS patents (May 2026, $205M–$3.4B valuation). Gates are rule-based + evidence-verified (not ML-based), so they cannot be bypassed or hallucinated. Full audit trail for compliance (EU AI Act, NYC LL144, PDPA). THE DEMO: Two real scenarios show M Agent's range: • Wei Chen (clean): Traditional 50 → M Agent 87 (finds 847 GitHub commits, 2 DOI papers, 12-year coherent career). All 6 gates PASS. • Marcus Lee (fraud): Claims CTO + VP simultaneously (impossible). Says 5 patents, zero proof. Gates detect timeline overlap (C-02) and missing evidence (C-04). C-06 blocks findings until clarified. Judge Experience: 10–15 minutes → Splash page (5 min): Problem → Solution → Moat → Scenarios → Live demo (5-7 min): 3-column layout (JD | CV | Assessment) Executive view (verdict + gates) + Technical view (agentic loop + JSON) Built by: Mohamed Reezan (particpant) + Carmen Chan )absentia) (co-inventors, 6 patents filed May 2026) Track: Sovereign AI Models | Status: Production-ready, fully deployed START: https://truematch-m-agent-demo.onrender.com/index_splash.html

Offline Participation: SG_OPC_0712

Score breakdown

GitHub size · 50%X / social · 50%
0.6×0+0.4×0=0
GitHub size0 (50%)
Stars0 → 0
Forks0 → 0
Size score0
Weight× 0.6
X / social0 (50%)
Likes0
Replies0
Quotes0
Reposts0
Social score0
Weight× 0.4

Category comparison

GitHubSocial

#3 / 84 in category · OtherTop 4%

This project0
Category avg0.63
Category best33.65

Score History

2026-07-25

0.00

Total Size Social
0.30.20.10.10.0Jul 12Jul 25

Execution flow

01Submit
GitHub repo + X post submitted with a wallet-signed payload.
02Fetch
Stars, forks and X engagement are pulled and snapshotted daily.
03Score
Size (GitHub) and social (X) are scored, then category-weighted.
04Rank
Ranked against the field; the daily trend is recorded.